Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has revolutionized the field of diagnostic imaging by providing detailed images of the human body's internal structures without the use of ionizing radiation. Despite the sophistication of MRI technology, it is not without its limitations. MRI artifacts, or distortions, are prevalent issues that can compromise the quality of diagnostic information. Among these, zipper and aliasing artifacts are particularly noteworthy due to their potential to mimic or obscure pathology. This article delves into the various MRI artifacts, with an emphasis on zipper and aliasing phenomena, and explores strategies to mitigate their effects.

MRI artifacts can be broadly categorized based on their origin: patient-related, signal processing-related, hardware-related, and sequence-specific. Understanding these categories helps in identifying the type of artifact and applying the appropriate corrective measure.

Patient-related artifacts are often due to motion, which can create ghosting or smearing effects. Voluntary or involuntary movement by the patient, blood flow, and peristalsis are typical sources. Signal processing-related artifacts arise from the complex algorithms used to reconstruct MRI images from raw data. Hardware-related artifacts stem from imperfections or malfunctions in the MRI scanner's components, such as the gradient coils or radiofrequency (RF) coils. Lastly, sequence-specific artifacts are inherent to the type of pulse sequence employed, with certain sequences being more prone to specific artifacts.

Zipper artifact are a form of RF interference that manifests as a series of parallel lines or "zippers" across the image. They are often caused by RF leakage from external sources such as electronic devices or broadcasting stations. The term "zipper" is apt due to the resemblance to the teeth of a zipper. To reduce these artifacts, it is crucial to maintain a controlled environment, minimizing interference from external RF sources and ensuring proper functioning and calibration of the RF shield within the MRI scanner room.

Aliasing, or wraparound, artifacts occur when the field of view (FOV) is smaller than the body part being imaged, causing signals from outside the FOV to be superimposed onto the opposite side of the image. This artifact is a consequence of undersampling and can be resolved by increasing the FOV or using oversampling techniques. It is also important to position the patient centrally within the magnet bore and apply saturation bands to suppress signals from outside the FOV.

Chemical shift artifacts arise due to the difference in resonance frequencies between fat and water protons, resulting in spatial misregistration on the image. Adjusting the bandwidth of the receiver or using fat suppression techniques can help minimize this type of artifact.

Susceptibility artifacts are caused by the interaction between the magnetic field and materials with different magnetic susceptibilities, such as metal implants or air-tissue interfaces. Gradient moment nulling and using sequences with shorter echo times (TE) can mitigate these artifacts.

Truncation artifacts, also known as Gibbs artifacts, appear as ringing or false structures near sharp interfaces. These are related to the inherent limitations of the Fourier Transform used in MRI image reconstruction. Increasing the matrix size can reduce this type of artifact.

Flow artifacts occur due to the movement of blood or cerebrospinal fluid during the imaging process. They can be reduced by employing flow compensation techniques or using sequences less sensitive to flow, such as gradient echo sequences with flow compensation.

Motion artifacts, as previously mentioned, can be particularly challenging to manage. Techniques like respiratory gating, cardiac gating, or faster imaging sequences can significantly reduce the impact of patient motion.

Cross-excitation and cross-talk artifacts happen in multi-slice imaging when the RF excitation of one slice affects nearby slices. Proper slice spacing and the use of interleaved slice acquisition can help avoid these problems.

Dielectric artifacts are more common at higher field strengths (3T and above) due to the uneven distribution of the RF field within the body. Using dielectric pads and adjusting the RF transmit field can help.

Magic angle artifacts occur when the collagen fibers are oriented at about 55 degrees relative to the main magnetic field, causing an increased signal on sequences with short TE. Awareness of this orientation-dependent phenomenon is essential for accurate diagnosis, especially in tendons and ligaments.

In conclusion, while MRI artifacts can pose significant challenges in image interpretation, a thorough understanding of these phenomena enables radiologists and technologists to anticipate and counteract their occurrence. By applying a combination of preventative strategies and post-processing techniques, the integrity of MRI can be maintained, ensuring the continued utility of this powerful diagnostic tool.

References:

Shellock, F. G., & Crues, J. V. (2004). MR Safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. American Journal of Roentgenology, 182(5), 1111-1114.

Dietrich, O., Raya, J. G., Reeder, S. B., Reiser, M. F., & Schoenberg, S. O. (2008). Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in MR images: Influence of multichannel coils, parallel imaging, and reconstruction filters. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 28(2), 256-263.

Hennig, J., Nauerth, A., & Friedburg, H. (1986). RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 3(6), 823-833.

Bernstein, M. A., King, K. F., & Zhou, X. J. (2004). Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Elsevier Academic Press.

Panych, L. P., & Madore, B. (2008). The physics of MRI safety. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 27(5), 1250-1258.

Reeder, S. B., & Markl, M. (2006). Cardiac MR Imaging: Physical Principles to Practical Protocols. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.